The Study of Racialism Forum Index
The Study of Racialism
Discussion of U.S. Racialism
Please read The Rules before posting.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch     RegisterRegister 
   Log inLog in 
'

South Saharan graves, two distinct populations

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Craniofacial Anthropometry and Racialism in Science
Author Message
Grasshoppa
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
{Posts: 188 }
Location: United States

PostPosted: Fri 15 Aug 2008 18:03    Post subject: South Saharan graves, two distinct populations Reply with quote

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/15/science/15sahara.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Quote:
When Paul C. Sereno went hunting for dinosaur bones in the Sahara, his career took a sharp turn from paleontology to archaeology. The expedition found what has proved to be the largest known graveyard of Stone Age people who lived there when the desert was green.

Skip to next paragraph
Multimedia
Slide Show
Stone Age Graveyard
Related
Shift From Savannah to Sahara Was Gradual, Research Suggests (May 9, 2008)

RSS Feed
Get Science News From The New York Times » The first traces of pottery, stone tools and human skeletons were discovered eight years ago at a site in the southern Sahara, in Niger. After preliminary research, Dr. Sereno, a University of Chicago scientist who had previously uncovered remains of the dinosaur Nigersaurus there, organized an international team of archaeologists to investigate what had been a lakeside hunting and fishing settlement for the better part of 5,000 years, originating some 10,000 years ago.

In its first comprehensive report, published Thursday, the team described finding about 200 graves belonging to two successive populations. Some burials were accompanied by pottery and ivory ornaments. A girl was buried wearing a bracelet carved from a hippo tusk. A man was seated on the carapace of a turtle.

The most poignant scene was the triple burial of a petite woman lying on her side, facing two young children. The slender arms of the children reached out to the woman in an everlasting embrace. Pollen indicated that flowers had decorated the grave.

The sun-baked dunes at the site, known as Gobero, preserve the earliest and largest Stone Age cemetery in the Sahara, Dr. Sereno’s group reported in the online journal PLoS One. The findings, they wrote, open “a new window on the funerary practices, distinctive skeletal anatomy, health and diet of early hunter-fisher-gatherers, who expanded into the Sahara when climatic conditions were favorable.”

The research was also described at a news conference on Thursday in Washington at the National Geographic Society, a supporter of the project.

The initial inhabitants at Gobero, the Kiffian culture, were tall hunters of wild game who also fished with harpoons carved from animal bone. Later, a more lightly built people, the Ténérians, lived there, hunting, fishing and herding cattle.

Other scientists said the discovery appeared to provide spectacular evidence that nothing, not even the arid expanse of the Sahara, was changeless. About 100 million years ago, this land was forested and occupied by dinosaurs and enormous crocodiles. Around 50,000 years ago, people moved in and left stone tools and mounds of shells, fish bones and other refuse. The lakes dried up in the last Ice Age.

Then the rains and lakes of a fecund Sahara returned about 12,000 years ago, and remained, except for one 1,000-year interval, until about 4,500 years ago. Geologists have long known that the region’s basins retained mineral residue of former lakes, and other explorers have found scatterings of human artifacts from that time, as Dr. Sereno did at Gobero in 2000.

“Everywhere you turned, there were bones belonging to animals that don’t live in the desert,” he said. “I realized we were in the green Sahara.”

Human skeletons were eroding from the dunes, including jawbones with nearly full sets of teeth and finger bones of a tiny hand pointing up from the sand.

From an analysis of the skeletons and pottery, scientists identified the two successive cultures that occupied the settlement. The Kiffians, some of whom stood up to six feet tall, both men and women, lived there during the Sahara’s wettest period, between 10,000 and 8,000 years ago. They were primarily hunter-gatherers who speared huge lake perch with harpoons.
Elena A. A. Garcea, an archaeologist at the University of Cassino in Italy, identified ceramics with wavy lines and zigzag patterns as Kiffian, a culture associated with northern Africa. Pots bearing a pointillistic pattern were linked to the Ténérians, a people named for the Ténéré desert, a stretch of the Sahara known to Tuareg nomads as a “desert within a desert.”

Christopher M. Stojanowski, an archaeologist at Arizona State University, said the two cultures were “biologically distinct groups.” The bones and teeth showed that in contrast to the robust Kiffians, the Ténérians were typically short and lean and apparently led less rigorous lives.

The shapes of the Ténérian skulls are puzzling, researchers said, because they resemble those of Mediterranean people, not other nearby groups.

Asked if he had adjusted to the transition from dinosaur paleontology to Stone Age archaeology, Dr. Sereno said, “It’s still weird for me to be digging up my own species.”
Back to top
Grasshoppa
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
{Posts: 188 }
Location: United States

PostPosted: Fri 15 Aug 2008 18:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know why the skulls of the tenerians are so "puzzling" to the archaeologists, considering the location of the Sahara and the fact that it was not always a desert.
Back to top
Grasshoppa
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
{Posts: 188 }
Location: United States

PostPosted: Sat 23 Aug 2008 17:39    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a question. What qualifies a skull as being "Mediterranean" in the first place? For some reason, I have a feeling that there is no uniform "Mediterranean" type.
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 4525 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Sun 21 Sep 2008 17:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess nobody here knows the answer to your questions. I sure don't.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Craniofacial Anthropometry and Racialism in Science All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group